There is no truth to the situation of Indus civilization people and their direct lineage to the stories of Indus known worship. The people of the plains of Indus valley or the plain lands of Indus were brown or pastry skin appearance people. Worship was known being whom r white.
Thus, the cause of grief among the dravidia people who live at present days central and south India. The dravidia people had come to belief that the Indus region people were from biblical relation, and r not.
The situation is that there r only three in the worship of true Indus people from days ago, and they worshipped whom r white, and they were never from this earth physical or this earth spirit people relations.
Stories from heaven were brought to the Indus region people whom worshipped them who r white.
Whom r Vai, Gai and Kai; Vaishnu, Gainash, and Kraishna. They r white, like white is snow, pure white.
Reason for the present days dravidia people had been led too belief that they who lived at Indus region were any other than brown appearance people is due to the false professing of the world of religions and agenda.
Present days ways of life at India has seen much assimilation of the judaism (jewish, islam, and christian) religion assimilation, thus causing confusion as too who were the origin people inhabiting or living at Indus lands is thus caused. True people who lived at those lands many many days ago r brown appearance people.
Their departure was due to a reason that is not openly spoken about or heard, and has a situation concering the death of Virgin Mary's son at the cross.
The is no further continuation of worship after Krishnaa, and the present days Bhart (India or Hindustan) has is a situation of assimilation and cultural identity due to regions. This situation would eventually cease, and normalization for mutual existence would remain.
They were brown skin appearance people.
Wahai guru ji kaa Khalsa. Wahae guru jee kee fateh.
Anyone of non indian origin reading about the the so-called white aryans and black sudroids on this might think that India is like the USA, where one can clearly see two different races (besides the Hispanics) the white and negro.
In India the 'caucacian north indians' and 'the sudroid south indians' are just niggers, look at Amitabh Bachchan, just another darkie. Vajpayee, another nigger, Ajay Devgan, blackie and the rest of north indians, EXCEPT the pashtuns, are niggers who speak an Aryan language,like Tiger Woods, Eddie Murphy and other black american blacks who speak an aryan language-English.
Pathetic black indo aryans.
Destruction of the Indus Dam System & Flooding
The larger metropolises of the Indus managed to withstand the Aryan onslaught due to the protection of massive walls. To force their capitulation, the Aryans smashed the sophisticated Indus dam and irrigation system, no trace of which now remains. This led to widepread monsoonal flooding, causing slit deposits which are still to be found in the ruins of the Indus cities, and destruction of the fertile topsoil. This meant the end of settled agriculture in the Indus basin. Thus the Vedas proudly praise Indra as the destroyer of this irrigation system, no trace of which now remains (vrtra=dam in Sanskrit) :
+ He smote Vrtra who encompassed the waters [ RgV.VI.20.2 ]
+ He smote Vrtra who enclosed the waters, like a tree with the bolt [ RgV.II.14.2 ]
+ He is referred to as `conquering the waters' ( apsujit ), which is his prime attribute.
+ Indra let loose the streams after slaying Vrtra [ RgV.IV.19.8 ]
+ He cleaves the mountian, making the streams flow [ RgV.I.57.6; X.89.7 ], even with the sound of his bolt [ RgV VI.27.1]
-- [ RgV I.57.6; II.14.2; IV.19.8; VI.20.2; VI.27.1; X.89.7 ] [ S+T.368 ]
In Sanskrit, `vrtra' is an `obstacle', and denotes a barrage or blockage [ Kos.70-71]. It is thus a word for `dam'. Dams now called Gebr-band are found on many water-courses of the western parts of the Indus region. Aryans shattered the dam system of the Indus, leading to silt deposits in Mohenjo-daro [ S+T.369]. This is vividly described in the Rig Veda:
+ When he [Indra] laid open the great mountain, he let loose the torrents and slew the Danava, he set free the pent up springs, the udder of the mountain. [ RgV V.32.1-2 ]
+ He slew the Danava, shattered the great mountian, broke open the well, set free the pent up waters. [ RgV I.57.6; V.33.1 ]
+ He releases the streams which are like impisoned cows [ RgV I.61.10 ]
+ He won the cows and soma and made the 7 rivers flow. [ RgV I.32.12; II.12.12 ]
+ He releases the imprisoned waters [ RgV I.57.6; I.103.2 ]
+ He dug out channels for the streams with his bolt [ RgV II.15.3 ], let the flood of waterrs flow into the sea. [ RgV II.19.3 ]
+ He caused the waters pent up by Vrtra to flow [ RgV III.26.6; IV.17.1 ]
-- [ Mac ] [ S+T.368-9 quotg Macdonell ]
Another verse explicitly mentions him as a destroyer of dams:
rinag rodhamsi krtrimani
= " he removed artificial barriers"
-- [ RgV 2.15.8 ]
Now, rodhas = "dam" elsewhere in the Rig Veda and in later Sanskrit [ S+T.369 ]. The above evidence, taken directly from the Rig Veda and not from any secondary source, is sufficient to implacate the Aryans as the destroyers of the dam systems of the ancient Indus.
The Vedic Dark Ages (1500 BC - 500 BC )
1. RigVedic (or First) Aryan Invasion
The Indus Valley Civilization, consisting of Semites ( approx. 40 % ), Negroids ( approx. 50 % ) and Mongoloids ( ca. 10 % ) marked a period of wealth and prosperity in Indian history. Noted developments include the development of yoga, the erection of ziggurats and the discovery of zero. All these inventions were later appropriated by the Aryan priests in what must have been the greatest case of scientific theft on record. As usual, considerable negationism exists surrounding this episode. The golden Harappan age came to an abrupt and violent end when hordes of barbaric Aryans swept into India in ca. 1500 BC through the Khyber Pass [ Kos ] [ Chan.S ] [ Chan.H ] [ Chan.V ]. Most of these, barring those known as `vratyas', were under the loose control of Indra of the Lunar Aryan race, who was later elevated into ancestor-godhood. The incredible damage done to Indian civilisation, culture, human population and environment during the Aryan invasions which spanned 1000 years are almost beyond estimation and beggar belief. Following this cataclysmic invasion, civilization in India collapsed into 1000 years of complete darkness. During this Vedic Dark Age (1500 BC - 500 BC) no civilization survives, no writing, nor any trace of the existence of even a semi-civilization. There is, even now in the late 20th century, complete ignorance concerning this era of Indian history. It was an unending series of slaughters and massacres of native Indians by barbaric invaders who considered it meritorious to butcher those of a different race. 1.1 Destruction of Harappan Cities
Indra was the first of the nomadic Aryan leaders to descend into India, indulging in cold-blooded murder of non-Aryans and wholesale genocide that matched those of the Nazi Germans centuries later. He was the epitome of the Aryan invader, and sybolised all that they stood for. Cruel and blood-thirsty, he was completely ruthless in warfare. This leader was later deified for his services to his `varna' (`skin color' or race). He killed his father in cold blood just because he had taken some of Indra's intoxicant, and was known to be a habitual drunkard. Tyrannical and barbaric, he ruthlessly slaughtered the Dasyus (`slaves', a contemptuous term applied to the native Sudroids). Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Regarding the origin of the term `Arya', Gunderic writes " `Arya' is a purely racial term, a probable derivation is 'ar', meaning strength or valour, from ar to fight, whence we have the name of the Greek war-god Ares." [ Gun ] This should lay to rest negationist claims put forth by Brahiminist scholars that `Arya' is not a racial term. The negationism and the fantasies set forth by some Brahmins that the Indus Valley was `Aryan' shall be dealt with later on. Indeed, so detailed is the evidence still surviving that the individual stages in the conquest can be traced. Sack of the Minor Towns
Initially, Indra sacked and pillaged the minor towns and villages of the Indus countryside. He is thus praised by the Vedic sages as Puroha or Purandhara, `sacker of cities' [ S+T.366 ] and is later elevated into godhood, ultimately becoming an incarnation of Vishnu. He destroyed 100 minor Indus towns:
" Indra overthrew 100 Puras made of stone ( asmanmayi ) for his worshipper Divodasa [ RgV.IV.30.20 ], evidently belonging to Sambara who is a Dasa ( non-Aryan black ) of the mountain " [ RgV.VI.26.5 ]
Al-Taqiyah :Infiltrate and destroy kafir countries
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries
- Dr. Walid
This article by Dr. Walid, a top scholar at the Islamic University, exposes our so-called secular Indian Muslims. By the doctrine of Al-Taqiyah, Muslims dominate crime syndicates, increase population by massive Bangladeshi infiltration and make temporary alliances with Dalits, Christians, etc.
In the early years of the Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy (non Muslims), Al-Taqiyah.
Al-Taqiyah, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy ...
According to Al-Taqiyah, Muslims were granted the Shar'iyee right (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition. These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and therefore were not considered as lying against or denouncing the tenants of Islam.
They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the enemy's resistance and level of mobilization. One of their major objectives was to cause a split among the enemy's camp while downplaying the issues related to Islam ("Oh, I am not religious." "Oh, that is not Islam, you are mistaken, there is so much misinformation." "Oh, it is in the interpretation." "Brother, Islam is all about peace and love and music just like in the 60s.")
In many instances, they convinced their targeted audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not targeted. Meanwhile the (allegedly) "un Islamic" Muslims continued their attacks on the target's property and life (e.g. Lashkar-e Toyiba, Mujahideen and Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war against innocent American civilians).
They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, and they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because they killed Issa (Jesus). They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.
They convinced the knitted diversity of India to degrade into civil war by introduction of a variant Buddhist / mystical Islam (Sufism which is decried as "deviant Islam" used to ease the transition of new recruits from local communities) creating divisions (based on Muslim - Non Muslim) eventually fomenting unrest and chaos in the land to prepare it for waves of armed Invasion (Mohammad bin Qasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, etc.).
Even today, India is bitterly divided and getting slowly Islamised as battle lines form between hordes of overzealous Muslims (armed and trained in madrasahs) and the more pacifist civilians of urban dwellings.
This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and efficient arms of the conquest. In less than four decades, the Middle East fell to the Arab-Islamic rule [since Arab society was divided again between pagan and Muslim resulting in nephews and sons killing their uncles and fathers in cold blood] followed by North Africa and Central Asia [this was the era of hordes like tribal conquests where barbaric savages invaded pacifist civilians in towns of major civilizations; the same scenario replayed itself against the Arab-Islamic world with the Invasion of the Mongolian hordes].
Al-Taqiyah was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and strategists. Today, scholars may identify it as deception. But the Jihadic deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow State interest of the regular Western subversive methods.
Al-Taqiyah is still in use today (and is widely practised and acknowledged by the Shi'ite sect) but not necessarily State-organized. Arab-Islamic missionaries are slowly converting the disillusioned criminal classes of the Western world by feeding them a Western "moderate" version of Islam (at the same time denouncing the actions of Muslims in the rest of the world as Un Islamic e.g. Taliban, GIA & FIA [Armed Islamic Front] of Algeria, Hamas, Lashkar -e Toyiba, Bin Laden and company, etc.)
It is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people.
A good example is the growing influence of Islamists in the Americas. On the one hand, American embassies, trade facilities, soldiers and intelligence infrastructures are under attack (but denounced as un-Islamic for the benefit of the new American converts).
On the other hand, the multiplying Islamic community (due to illegal immigration, paper marriages, religious visas granted to the religious men) attempts to pass itself off as "peace loving" and patriotic. In their own circles, the same community will liberally and violently denounce America, the West and its values (freedom, individualism, secularism, capitalism, scientific materialism, benign rehabilitation of criminals, prevention of cruelty against animals, women and gay rights).
One can easily detect Taqiyah in the two discourses used by Islamist strategists. On the one hand, one comprehensive Islamist theory is attempting to mobilize the Middle East, and sometimes Western Christian leaders and intellectuals, against "evil Jews".
They are forming alliances with everyone from Animal Rights' groups (to attack the Jewish tradition of slaughter which is ironically similar in cruelty to the Islamic way) to Far Right fundamentalists (to push for censorship of critiques of Islam and attack every forward thinking movement like women's rights and gay rights).
We see considerable success on that level. And on the other hand, another Islamist comprehensive theory is attempting - with success also - to mobilize the Jews against "evil and pagan Christians".
One can easily detect the sophisticated work of Taqiyah, for the strategic objective of Islamists is to destroy the foundations of the non Muslim civilizations, as a prelude to the defeat of an isolated Israel, India, United States of America, Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Russia, Egypt, Afghanistan, etc.
Taqiyah is not a unique phenomenon in history. Many strategists from all backgrounds implemented subversion. But the uniqueness of today's Taqiyah is its success within advanced and sophisticated societies. Taqiyah is winning massively because of the immense lack of knowledge among Western elites, both Jewish and Christian.
For interesting examples of Taqiyah methods, visit Christian discussion groups and forums and note the discourse of Islamist visitors aimed at undermining the Christian perception of Jews, and visit Jewish discussion groups and forums and note the subtle anti-Christian discourse of Islamist visitors. It is really informative and fascinating.
First batch of curriculum-trained Dalit priests ready
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dalits eye new rites in UP...
Tarannum Manjul
(Lucknow, May 7)
In a few days from now, another - the last and most decisive - bastion of the Hindu upper castes is set to fall in Uttar Pradesh. With the graduation of the first batch of curriculum-trained priests in the state, several Dalit pundits will be ready to offer their services for the entire range of traditional Hindu rites.
The class of 2002 in the UP Sanskrit Sansthan's paurohitya (priesthood) course includes several Dalit and other non-Brahmin students. The three-month course that was started in February, aimed at training students in the range of karmakand rites from mundan and vivah sanskar (marriage) to vrats (fasts) and tyohar (festivals).
The students have been trained by priests who were picked from a large pool of Sanskrit scholars in the state.
The scholars were given extensive training before being asked to fan out in the districts to impart their knowledge to priesthood-hopefuls. With the course now nearing completion almost everywhere, lists of successful trainees have begun to come in - they will receive certificates, and will be recognised as 'registered pundits' qualified to perform karmakand rites.
The course attracted 35 students on an average in each of the 70 districts where it was offered. It was welcomed enthusiastically at some places, and received a lukewarm response at others.
The maximum number of Dalit trainees in a district was five - in Varanasi. There were four in Lalitpur, three each in Gorakhpur and Unnao, two each in Mirzapur, Lucknow and Chitrakoot, and one each in Jaunpur, Deoria, Mau, Ambedkarnagar and Kushinagar.
"We had kept the course open for everyone, as we wanted the knowledge to be made available to all," said Dr Sachidanand Pathak, director of Sanskrit Sansthan.
"But we had no idea that we would receive such a good response from castes other than Brahmins as well."
www.hindustantimes.com/no...tnat01.asp
The areal extent of the Indus Valley civilization exceeded that of the Egyptian and Mesopotamian put together. The population of Egypt in the 2nd millenium BC is put at 2-3 million [ EB 18 `egypt' 104 ]. The Mesopotamian was of similar magnitude, and hence the total population of the Indus Valley was likely to have been 5-6 million. This is the lower limit to the casualty estimate for the First Sudra Holocaust only, for the overwhelming bulk of this population was slaughtered in battle or during the mass burning of the Indus cities.
The population of Mohenjo-daro was estimated by Lambrick at 35000 and that of Harappa as being similar, while Fairservis gave estimates of 41250 for Mohenjo-daro and 23500 for Harappa [ EB 21 `ind' 27 ]. Thus, the death toll from the destruction of these two cities alone can be estimated at 40000 Semite Panis & 40000 Sudroids Negroes.
The total casualty estimate for the entire period of Early Aryan Invasions is perhaps around 20 million, more than 3 times larger than the genocide of Jews by Nazis.
Exalted Indra -
In addition to deification for his extermination of native Indian races, Indra is praised for several other deeds :
Patricide : Indra is praised for having murdered his father when he stole some of Indra's soma:
" Who has made thy mother a widow? Who has sought to slay the sleeping and the waking? What deity has been more gracious than thou, since thou hast slain thy father having seized him by the foot? "
-- [ RgV.IV.18.12 ] [ S+T.371 ]
He performed this deed as his father had stolen some intoxicant from Indra's stock [ Tait.Sam. VI.1.3.6 ][ S+T.371 ].
Drunkard : Indra was a habitual drunkard and murdered in that inebriated state. "To the ancient poets of the Rigveda, the personal bearing and strength of Indra were highly honourable, though these were often exhibited under the influence of alcohol or the intoxicating drink they call soma" [ S+T.371 ].
Adultery : Indra was famous as an adulterer, having seduced many married women (cf. Ahalya etc.)
Following this, the First Aryan Invasion, civilization disappeared from India for one thousand years (1500 BC - 500 BC). No city was built during this era of darkness, writing was forgotten, no literature survives. Just pure darkness. Yet Indra was subsequently deified and is today considered an incarnation of Vishnu, the supreme god of Indo-Aryans! He has set a good example for the Nazis of Germany and the Hindu fundamentalists who destroyed the Babri Masjid on Dec. 6, 1992 and demolished numerous churches in 1998.
Genocide of Semites
Although Negroids (Dravidians and Kolarians) represent the original inhabitants of India, large number of Semites (referred to as `Panis' or Phoenicians in Aryan records) immigrated into the Indus Valley. They introduced features of Mesopotamian civilization, eg. seals, ziggurats etc. and eventually came to form nearly half of the population of the Indus Valley.
These Semites were also subject to genocide by the Aryans. No regard was shown to the life of these non-Aryans. During the height of the slaughter, an Aryan poet encourages his brethren to continue the genocide of Semites:
" Ye mighty ones [ Aryan Asvins ] what do you do there;
why do you stay there among the people who are held in high esteem through not offering sacrifices;
ignore them, destroy the life of the Panis "
-- [ RgV I.83.3 ] [ S+T.365 ]
During the large-scale burning of Indus cities by Aryans depicted above in `Genocide of Negroids' most of the Semites perished as well.
A summary that the Panis represent a branch of Semitic Phoenicians that migrated to India in prehistoric times is given below :
Trade: The Panis are referred to as traders, the traditional profession of Phoenicians and Semites.
Currency: In fact, a currency, the pana, is current in India much later during Maurya times. It is named after this merchant race.
Pani and Phoenician are cognate terms.
Hence the hatred Hitler felt for the Semitic Jews in Nazi Germany is mirrored in the Vedas. We wonder if this was the source for Hitler's feelings towards Semites. Considering the importance given by Nazis to the Indo-Aryan texts, the adoption of the swastika, the re-use of the term and racial concept of `Aryan', this is quite likely.
Genocide of Mongoloids
The Mongoloids entered India from the north-east, eventually forming a significant minority (probably 5- 10 %) of the Indus Valley (cf. the Mongoloid skulls of Mohenjo-daro) and the bulk of the population in Eastern India and the Ganges delta. Aryan records refer to them as `Nagas' (Snake-worshippers) and `Kiratas' (Mongoloid Keraits). They were thus not the immediate victims of the First Aryan Holocaust, but were suffered much during subsequent Aryan invasions into Eastern India.
The discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization in the 1920s brought to light a suppressed chapter of Indian history, namely the large-scale destruction and genocide perpetrated over 1000 years by the Aryan invaders on indigenous Negroid Sudras, Mongoloids and Semites. However, this episode is blatantly denied by the Brahmin-controlled press of India, which propagates highly distorted versions of history, and even goes to the extent of denying that any genocide took place. Such distortion of history leads to the continuation of crimes against humanity; the massacre of Sudroid Tamils in Sri Lanka by Aryan Buddhists and the genocide of Dalits by the Brahmanist Republic of India after 1947 are merely consequences of the negationist mindset. In order to comprehend current Caucasoid-Negroid conflicts in South Asia, it is necessary to comprehend the full history of the engagement. In order to solve the current Arya-Sudra problem in India a clear unbiased understanding of history is required. This book seeks to address some of these concerns, and hopes to provide a factual account of atrocities perpetrated by the Aryan invaders. This book demonstrates that the Aryan invasions were the most severe catastrophe to afflict the Indian subcontinent. In fact, several Holocausts occurred during this period :
The Semitic Holocaust - This refers to the annihilation of the Indic Semitic peoples comprising the Indo-Assyrians (`Asuras') and the Indo-Pheonicians (`Pnais').
The Sudra Holocaust - By far the most severe Holocaust was that inflicted upon the Sudra Negroids, who were exterminated from all of North India. Under the impact of the Aryan invasions, the Sudroid race broke up into the disparate units of Dravidians, Kolarians, Dalits and Adivasis. The Dravidian Brahui isolate surviving in Baluchistan is an extremely northern isolate of the ancient Sudric stock.
The Naga Holocaust - The Indo-Mongoloid populations of Eastern India were also massacered during the Later Aryan invasions in what is referred to as the Naga or Kirata holocaust. The behaviour pattern of the invaders was not limited to slaughter during war-times, but embraced the large-scale persecution of indigenous populations. There were several aspects to the invasions, which were as follows :
Mass slaughter of non-Aryans not only during war but also during peacetime.
Establishment of the Vedic Apartheid (`caturvarna') System based on varna (race, or skin colour).
Vedic human sacrifice (`purushamedha') of large numbers of non-Aryans by Vedic Brahmins.
Forced Labour extracted from non-Brahmins.
Capture of large numbers of non-combatant men, women and children as booty and their sale into slavery in Aryan households.
Forcible conversion of people, initially to the Vedic religion, and later to the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, mainly to Vaishnavism.
Reduction of the Status of first non-Aryans and later non-brahmins to that of sub-humans through prevention of learning and destruction of non-Brahmin literature and culture.
Destruction of temples belonging to pre-Brahmanic religions like Shaivism, Shaktism and Tantrism and their replacement with Vedist and Vaishnava mandirs.
Impoverishment of the non-Aryans, and later of non-Brahmins, through religious fraud, appropriation of land, discriminatory taxes, and confiscation of womens' properties after the Sati ritual. Nor was this conflict over with the end of the Brahmanic Dark Ages in 1000 AD. The Vijayanagar Kingdom of South India re-imposed the harsh Vedic apartheid caste system, whoch was again adopted by the Maratha kingdom. During the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era, this Aryan revival spread from the South and infected the more liberal Islamicised North. The Government of India also permits the continuation of the Vedic caste system in many parts of its territory. Tnis book does not attempt to study all aspects of the age under question, but shall present a brief account of the events. By necessity, the ghastly nature of the Aryan invasion makes any such task extremely unpleasant. More so, when one comes to Brahminist politics, with its ruthless Kautilyan creation and destrucion of entire states and peoples. Yet all throughout, I have kept a basically objective view of events.
1. The Aryan Invasions
The following are the invasions elaborated in the later parts of the book. The all-pervading spirit of negationism falsely portrays ancient racial conflicts as purely political struggles. The following pages shall rectify that. To summarise, there was not one, but several Aryan invasions during the history of India. (1) Rigvedic Aryan Invasion (1500 BC) :
The First Aryan Invasion involved the annihilation of the Semito-Negroid (Sudra-Panian) Indus Valley civilization by the hordes of Indra , and the slaughter of 5 million of its inhabitants. The Indus irrigation system was shattered to permanently destroy agriculture in the region. Sudroid blacks were displaced from all of North India, the survivors retreating to the hill tracts of Bundelkhand-Gondwana. (2) Second Aryan Invasion (1400 BC) :
Bharata launched the second Aryan invasion from Afghanistan, and conquered much of the upper Ganges valley, defeating the descendants of the first wave of invasions under Indra. (3) The Krishnaite (Third) Aryan Invasion (1200 BC) :
Krishna launched the third Aryan invasion, invading Western India (Gujarat, Rajastan etc.) from Mathura in Aryavarta. He finally established his capital there, naming it Dwarka. He destroyed the surviving traces of the Indus Valley civilization, abducting and raping 16000 women (low-caste `gopis') of the races he exterminated. Survivals of these acts are found in the much toned-down Krishna-gopi songs. (4) Mahabharatan Aryan Invasion (900-800 BC) :
The Fourth Aryan Invasion occurred in 2 parts: First, the Digvijay Aryan invasions that led to the subjugation of all of India to the Aryan yoke. The revolt by the non-Aryans and mixed races led to the terrible Mahabharatan War between the Aryan Pandavas on one side and the mixed race Kauravas and black aboriginals on the other. The Aryan victory enabled them to invade & settle in the Ganges valley and confirmed Aryan dominance. The genocides of this war permanently changed the racial composition of India. These conflicts were some of the most terrible recorded. (5) Fifth (Solar) Aryan Invasion (800 BC) :
The Fifth Aryan invasion is named Solar, since the Aryans who invaded India during this epoch were of the Solar race (Suryavamsi), while the earlier Aryans were of Lunar race (Chandravamsi). Kashyap (ie. from the Caspian) is the progenitor of the Solar race of kings. From the Caspian they swept down into India, driving the preceding peoples before them. Ikshvaku established his chiefdom at Ayodhya, while his grandson Mithi conquered Mithila (named after him). Parasurama continued the 5th Aryan invasion, exterminating various aboriginal races. (6) Ramaite Aryan Invasion & Dravidian Holocaust (600 BC) :
The 6th Aryan invasion of the deep South (Dravidia) by the armies of `Lord' Ram led to the fall of the Rakshasa (Dravidian) empire & the destruction of the splendid city of Ravana. The apartheid varna system was imposed, with those black Dravidian Sudras who accepted Aryan enslavement being relegated to the `Clean Sudra' caste , while those who fought the Aryans were relegated to the `Untouchable Sudra' castes (`panchama') of Dalits and Adivasis. The worship of the Aryan religion of Vaishnavism was introduced, and most Dravidians in Lanka exterminated. (7) Buddhist Aryan Invasion (260 BC) :
This Seventh Aryan invasion was launched by Askoka, King of Aryan Magadha. His attack on Kolarian Kalinga led to the horrible Kalinga War, in which 200,000 black aboriginals were killed & countless more enslaved. Several wars with the aboriginal races were waged. The Aryanised religions of Jainism and Buddhism entered South India. Although these religions were liberal with Aryan castes, and Buddha was in fact a Mongoloid, these faiths kept the fundamental Aryan-Sudroid apartheid varna system. The Aryan Sinhalese Buddhists, invading from East India, meanwhile, exterminated the entire population of native black Dravidoids . Staunch Buddhist fanatics, they destroyed scores of Shaiva shrines, erecting Buddhist temples on the ruins and eventually eradicating Shaivism from Lanka. (8) Eighth Aryan Invasion (100 BC) :
The Eighth Aryan Invasion occurred under the Maharashtrian Satavahanas. They invaded Dravidia, sacking several cities and annexing Dravidian lands. This was the first of the Maharasthrian Aryan Invasions. (9) Nineth (Guptan) Aryan Invasion (250 AD) :
Samudra Gupta of the Gupta dynasty in Aryavarta invaded south India and conquered several non-Aryan nations. The famous invasion of Daskhinapatha led to the subjugation of many native Indian races, incl. Tamil Nadu. This led to a hardening of the varna system even in remote areas. Several wars with the Scythians were also waged. (10) Rajput (Scythic) Aryan Invasion (300 AD - 1400 AD) :
The Rajputs are descendants of Scyths, Greeks, Kushans, Romans, etc. who entered India mostly after the fall of Guptan Koshala. Finding Aryavarta (Braj-Koshala) dominated by Aryans, they entered Rajastan and over several centuries, annihilated the Black Abroginal population of Bhils & Minas. (11) Eleventh Aryan Invasion (600 - 1000 AD) :
This occurred under the Maharashtrian Chalukyas, and is also known as the Second Maharasthrian Aryan Invasion. During these wars, Pulkesin II (610 - 642) conquered several Dravidian peoples, and invaded Tamil Nadu. Finally, after severe persecution of Dravidians, a wave of revolt by the Dravidian Shaivite Lingayats destroyed Aryan Chalukya rule. (12) Vijayanagaran Aryan Invasion (1336-1646) :
The semi-Aryanized Andhras embarked on one of the most systematic subjugations of the Dravidian races on record. The entire epoch of the dark Vijayanagar empire was one of conquest, oppression, and mass murder of Dravidians. In the Apartheid Andhrite Vijayanagar varna system, a semi-Aryan Mulatto Nair warrior would shoot a Dravidian Sudra Negro at sight . (13) Oriya Aryan Invasion (1450-60 AD) :
Kapilendradeva of Indo-Aryan Orissa invaded the Dravidian nations in the 1450s-60s, conquering the Reddi kingdom of Vengi and pillaging his way deep into Tamil Nadu. (14) Mughal Caliphate of Islam : The Mughal Caliphate of Delhi in Hindustan (North India) meant the end of the apartheid varna system in the north. Sudra Blacks could re-enter civilization, and contributed much to Mughalstani (Indo-Islamic) civilization as warriors, miners, agricultural labour, police, etc. The varna apartheid system remained in force in Dravida Nadu (South India), however. Here the Aryan Brahmins collaborated with the Aryan Islamic invaders from Central Asia and maintained this inhuman institution.
(15) Marathan (Thirteenth) Aryan Invasion (18th century) :
The barbaric Marathas launched the fourteenth Aryan invasion. All Dravidian nations were subjugated to the Aryan yoke once again. Blacks were subject to severe oppression, eg. the Peshwa rulers forced the Dalits in Maharashtra to carry pots to hold their own spittle and brooms to wipe away their footsteps as they walked. (16) European Aryan Invasions (1500s-1947) :
With the help of the Aryan Brahmans, the Portuguese Aryan invaders managed to conquer Malabar. The Portuguese allowed their white cousins to maintain the apartheid varna system of Manu in most of Malabar, and even adopted some of its features in Goa. The Aryan Anglo-Saxon invaders were also supported by the Indo-Aryans, especially the Brahmans (cf. RSS never opposed the English, Congress supported the English in World War I, etc.). The kindred Aryan civilizations adopted much from each other, eg. the Theosophical Society, etc., but combined in their suppression of Black Sudra civilization. (17) Republic of India (1947 ->) :
The Republic of India officially perpetrated the pro-Aryan government of the English. Thus, Sudra Religion (Saivism) is not recognised as a separate religion, but they are classed, along with all Sudra Blacks, as (Aryan) Hindus. It has been shown that they are not the Hindus. This was mainly due to the racist anti-Sudra M.K.Gandhi, who prevented the British, and later the Indian Government from enacting such legislation. `Khari Boli' Hindi, heavily Sanskritised, is, along with English, the co-official language of India, and is expanding rapidly at the expense of Dravidian tongues.
. The Vedic & Vaishnava Ideologies of Brahmanism
How did this behaviour pattern persist so consistently over a period of more than 2500 years under very different conditions ? Is there any deeper ideological source ? Was it, as is sometimes claimed, merely due to econonic complustions ? The answer is that these acts are rooted in the Vedic religious teachings and subsequent Vaishnava theology of Brahmanism. It is only for this reason that the Brahmanic world view could persist for such a long period of time. This ideology is derived from the peculiarly Brahmanist Vedic-Vaishnava concepts of Aryan, varna (`skin-color', `caste' or `race'), dasyu (`slavery'), iconoclasm, Manu-Smirti, rakshasa, brahmana, Aryavarta and Brahmavarta. Non-Brahmin India is called upon to make a deeper study of the Vedic and Vaishnava religions than they have hitherto done. It shall neglect this task at its own peril. By means of translations into European languages, these notions entered 19th century Europe and led to the rise of racism and Nazism. Hence, blacks and non-Aryans all over the world are called upon to make a closer scrutiny of the Vedic and Vaishnava religions. Negroes all across the world are called upon to realise that their suffering at the hands of Caucasoids did not start in the 18th century with the rise of plantation slavery in the US South, but date back to several centuries, and started with the Aryan invasion of India.
3. Negationism & Denial of Aryan Invasions
Negationism in General
Genocide has been a recurring event in human history. Thus, the genocide of the Native Americans by invading Latin Europeans, the mass murders of Communism, and the massacres of ethnic Palestinians by Isreali Jews are all historically documented events. Yet, each episode has its own brand of deniers and negationists. At the same time it must be admitted that sometimes the claim of genocide is now all too commonly used, being applied for even small-scale massacres which technically speaking do not come under that category. I shall show that the Aryan Invasions led to several Holocausts of staggering magnitude, including the Sudra Holocaust, which was the largest of these. Denial of the Aryan Invasions
In recent years a considerable vociferous movement has arisen completely denying the Aryan invasions. This brand of `scholars' goes to any length to deny the notion of any Aryan invasion. Even physical facts are distorted merely to fit in with their fanciful concepts. Another fraud perpetrated by these scholars is to perpetually claim that their theory denying an Aryan invasion is `new'. This is definitely not true; indeed, the traditional Vaishnava Puranic view, which is supported by all the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, is that the Aryas migrated from Aryavarta in Bharat and then spread all across the world. Moreover, ever since the discovery of the non-Aryan Harappan civilization the Aryans have been inventing wild and fantastic theories denying the invasion. Patterns in the Deniers of Holocaust
What could be the reasons for such a vociferous denial of established facts ? Is it just plain guilt ? Or is there some hidden agenda ? Firstly, there are several things to notice regarding the background of the `scholars' who propound these negationist theories :
Brahmins - Most of the scholars propagating these hypotheses, including Golwalkar and Rajaram, are Brahmins. The rest are either Aryans or a handful of European sympathisers such as Frawley, Gautier and Elst. In all cases, they are all white-skinned Caucasoids who are denying crimes allegedly perpetrated by white-skinned Caucasoids. Taking such attempts seriously is like trying to ask Nazi historians to write an unbiased account of the Holocaust. Whatever unbiased theories shall ultimately prevail, these must be produced by neutral third parties not involved in the incident.
European `Hindus' - Most of the European deniers of Aryan invasions, such as Koenraad Elst, Francois Gautier and David Frawley, are converts to `Hinduism', which in technical terms means one of the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, generally of a Vaishnavite sub-sect. Needless to say, such persons shall not be allowed to enter the Vaishnava Jagannath temple at Puri or many other Vaisnava temples, yet these persons still like to live in a fantasy-world where they imagine themselves to be `Hindu'. Thus, David Frawley is an American convert to Vaishnavism, as is the virulently anti-Islamic Belgian Roman Catholic Koenraad Elst and Francois Gautier is a French devotee of Aurobindo. All these persons have hence adopted the `Indian Home for Aryans' hypothesis as a result of their religious persuasion.
Hindutva - The Denial of Aryan Invasions is central to the Hindutva ideology, a neo-Brahmanist form of Vedic fascism. This movement is famous for being involved in the organisation of pogroms against various races, notably Christians, Dalits, Sikhs and Muslims. The Denial of Aryan Invasions is accompanied by a virulent hatred of Christians and Muslims, who are dubbed as `invaders'. Sudra human-rights activists are, in this framework, dubbed as `traitors' to the `Indian' Brahmanist tradition. Pseudo-Secular Denial
A far more subtle form of denial has, however, been the officially propagated version of history by the `leftist' dominated universities of India for the last 50 years. In this version of teaching, Aryan invasions are accepted; it is also accepted that the Harappan civilization was pre-Aryan. However, the Sudra Holocaust is denied by asserting that the Harappan civilization was not destroyed by the Aryan invaders, but collapsed due to some other means. There was then a `peaceful interaction' between these two cultures, and no Genocide. This version is also referred to as the `soft' AIT (Aryan Invasion Theory), and has caused far more damage to history on account of its `correct' appearance, accepting the most well-established facts. Firstly, most of the Communists and other leftists are Brahmins. Pandit Nehru, his daughter Indira Gandhi (who married the Iranian Brahmin, or `Parsi', Feroze Gandhi) and his grandson (technically still a Brahmin) Rajiv Gandhi were all Brahmins. Namboodirpad, the leader of the first democratically elected Communist government in the world, was a Kerala Brahmin. Virtually the entire hierarchy of Indian Communism, including Marxism and Leninism, consists of Brahmins. More than 60 % of leaders of all Communist organisations in India are Brahmins. Only Maoism, of Chinese origin, is not. The reason for this is that Kautilya, a Brahmin minister during the Mauryan Empire, is the founder of totalitarianism; all forms of communism are based on his teachings as expounded in the Arthasastra. Totalitarian Communism is thus a Brahmin invention. In this Communist framework, the Holocaust is denied by asserting that `natural causes' led to its downfall, or that `internal decay' were the reasons. Again, the motive is the same as in the case of the Brahmin supremacist Hindutva movement, namely to deny the Sudra Genocide. However, since it is not as obviously wrong, this point of view is widely held, even amongst scholars and requires much more effort to disprove. Alternative Theories
The only reason for the fall of the Harappan civilization is due to Aryan invasions. Here all other hypotheses are refuted in a short space. elaborations are to be found in the book; the following is a brief summary :
Comet Impact - Absurd suggestions have been put forth that a cometary impact led to the fall of the Indus Valley. The fact is, no trace of an iridium anomaly that is generally characteristic of all meteorite impacts (eg. the K/T crater in Mexico) has been found. Also absent is any trace of a crater.
Volcanic Eruptions - There are no traces of any volcano vents nearby, nor is there any volcano crater in the vicinity.
Floods & Climate Change - There are signs of flooding in the Indus cities, and climate changes also occurred. The Kautilyanists hence often attribute the demise of the IVC (Indus Valley Civilization) to flooding. Yet the Aryan researchers do not state why these changes occurred. The fact is, as vividly displayed in the book, these changes were brought about by Aryanist environmental destruction. The annihilation of the Indus dam and irrigation system and the fact that Rajastan and the Punjab are now one Great Thar Desert, are all due to the catastrophic environmental degradation caused by the Aryan marauders. Denial of Historical Aryan Invasions
Even historical Aryan Invasions, such as the Ashokan Aryan invasion, or the Maratha Aryan Invasions, are portrayed as `political' wars rather than race wars. Asoka himself, who deported hundreds of thousands of Kalingans, and massacered thousands of Jains after his conversion to Buddhism, are all crimes that have been `white-washed' and erased from the Sudra mind. More significantly, the post-Maratha Marathas are presented as `liberators' from Muslim rule by both `left' and `right', while in actual fact they reinstated Vedic forms of apartheid and suppressed the Dalits in Maharasthra to the the level of sub-humans. The fact that the Marathas massacred half of the `fellow-Hindu' population of Rajastan is also swept under the carpet. The cult of Shivaji in modern times led to the rise of the Maratha fascist Shiv Sena. It is interesting to note that the anti-Islamic rhetoric of the Shiv Sena and its leader Bal Thackeray is of late origin; the movement started and spread solely on the basis of the anti-Dalit platform. Pogroms against the Dalits were organised directly by the Shiv Sena, and statues of Ambedkar continue to be smashed even when the party had officially taken an `anti-Muslim' stand. Secret Motives for the Denial of the Sudra Holocaust
Let it be said straight away - the motive for Indo-Aryan Denial of Aryan Invasions is part of a greater secretive plan to obliterate Sudra civilization from the face of the earth. I now come to explain how this is so. Firstly, there are only two possible motives for such a denial: either out of a sense of guilt, or out of deep-seated, sometimes camouflaged, hatred of the victims. If guilt is the main reason, then the denial of historic crimes is not accompanied by a denigration of the victims' race and culture. It is now imperative to study what are the assertions of the Deniers of the Aryan Invasions : 1) Vedic Indus Valley - The Brahminist theory denying Aryan invasions necessarily implies that the Harappan civilization was `Aryan' and Sanskrit based. Essentially this amounts to a theft of Sudra civilization, implying that the aboriginal was permanently a forest-dweller inherently incapable of creating any civilization. 2) Sub-Human Sudras - Indirectly, this theory implies that the Sudra were not civilized humans, but were sub-humans living in the forest waiting to be civilized by Aryans. 3) Eternal Brahmin Rule - This theory also implies that the Brahmins have been the rulers of all of South Asia from time immemorial. It is another indirect justification for the casteist `Purusha-sukta' hymn of the Vedas which states that the Brahmins were created to rule over humanity on account of their birth from Brahma's head. 6) Sanskrit Origin of Sudric Languages - Again, as per this model, the Sudric (or Dravido-Kolarian) languages are descendants of Sanskrit. Essentially, beneath the veil of pseudo-scholarship, the theory says that Dravidian and Kolarian languages are degraded forms of Sanskrit. 5) Continuation of Apartheid - By its justification of Brahmin rule, and the simultaneous glorification of Shivaji, this theory is basically in justification of apartheid. If follows that the plan of denying the Sudra Holocaust is part of a greater gameplan, ranging from the soft AIT of neo-Kautilyan Communists to the OIT (Out-of-India Theory ) of neo-Manuite Hindutvadins, attempting to obliterate Sudroid (Dravido-Kolaric) civilizations. Where is the Sudra Holocaust Museum ?
In summary, one may ask, `Where is the Museum of the Sudra Holocaust ?' . The Jews have their Holocaust Museum, but where is ours ? Nazi Gold has now been mostly returned to its rightful owners. But what about Brahmin Gold ? `Why is the illegally acquired Brahmin Gold not being returned to its rightful owners, the Sudras ?'
Read John Keay " A History of India"
"Certainly the most balanced and the most lucid history of India ever written...his passion for India shines and illuminates every page...puts Keay in the front rank of Indian historiographers"
-The Washington Post
"Superb, and so complete that it is unlikely to be bettered for many years to come'
-Guardian
Read it. All your theories will go down the drain.
He asks a few questions that I ask of you? Where are the millions of bodies of warrior clad Dravidian men that tryed to fight off the Aryans?
Why is there not a mention of a place outside of India in any of the Hindu Holy books?
The so called Aryans came from the arid deserts of Afganistan and Central Asia to the fertile lands of Northern India and yet failed to record it?
I will end with a verse from John Keays "A History of India"
He says " Indra stood accused of massacring Dravidians throughout the 1950s untill 1964 when the case against him collapsed. The American George F Dales took a long hard look at all the skeletons, and could find only two that might have been massacred. Most of the others seem to have been just casually interred centuries later. There is no destruction level covering the latest period of the city, no sign of extensive burning, no bodies of warriors clad in armour and surrounded by weapons of war, and the citidel, the only fortified part of the city, yeilded no evidence of a final defence"
"Aryan catapults and chariots could not have made a impression on the walls of Mohanjo-Daro which were 13 metres thick"
"Neither in the code of Manu nor, I believe, in the Vedas, nor then any other book that is older then the code, is there any allusion to a prior residence, or to a knowledge of more than the name of any country out of India. Even Mythology goes no further then the Himalaya chain,in which is fixed the habitation of the Gods"
-Mountstuart Elphinstone
I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar. (Max Muller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120) In Vedic Literature, the word Arya is nowhere defined in connection with either race or language. Instead it refers to: gentleman, good-natured, righteous person, noble-man, and is often used like 'Sir' or 'Shree' before the name of a person like Aryaputra, Aryakanya, etc.
So nowhere either in the religious scriptures or by tradition the word Arya denotes a race or a language. There are only four primary races, namely, Caucasian, the Mangolian, the Australians and the Negroid. Both the Aryans and Dravidians are related branches of the Caucasian race generally placed in the same Mediterranean sub-branch. The difference between the so-called Aryans of the north and the Dravidians of the south or other communities of Indian subcontinent is not a racial type. Biologically all are the same Caucasian type, only when closer to the equator the skin gets darker, and under the influence of constant heat the bodily frame tends to get a little smaller. And these differences can not be the basis of two altogether different races. Similar differences one can observe even more distinctly among the people of pure Caucasian white race of Europe. Caucasian can be of any color ranging from pure white to almost pure black, with every shade of brown in between. Similarly, the Mongolian race is not yellow. Many Chinese have skin whiter than many so-called Caucasians.
Further, a recent landmark global study in population genetics by a team of internationally reputed scientists over 50 years (The History and Geography of Human Genes, by Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza, Princeton University Press) reveals that the people habitated in the Indian subcontinent and nearby including Europe, all belong to one single race of Caucasion type. According to this study, there is essentially, and has been no difference racially between north Indians and the so-called Dravidian South Indians. The racial composition has remained almost the same for millennia. This study also confirms that there is no race called as an Aryan race.
Presence of Horse at Indus-Saraswati sites
It is argued that the Aryans were horse riding, used chariots for transport, and since no signs of horse was found at the sites of Harappa and Mohanjo-daro, the habitants of Indus valley cannot be Aryans. Well, this was the case in the 1930 - 40 when the excavation of many sites were not completed. Now numerous excavated sites along Indus valley and along the dried Saraswati river have produced bones of domesticated horses. Dr. S. R. Rao, the world renowned scholar of archeology, informs us that horse bones have been found both from the 'Mature Harappan' and 'Late Harappan' levels. Many other scholars since then have also unearthed numerous bones of horses: both domesticated and combat types. This simply debunks the non-Aryan nature of the habitants of the Indus valley and also identifies the Vedic culture with the Indus valley civilization
Yet even a Communist historian in India like Romila Thapar, who previously endorsed the invasion theory has been forced to backtrack and no longer emphasises it. She recently notes in a Frontline interview:
"Introducing archaeological data into historical studies also forces historians to think along interdisciplinary lines. The decline of the Indus cities is attributed to a range of causes, of which ecological change is among the major ones."
Bharat is Not India
In modern times, bigoted Brahmins have projected Bharatavarsha as the ancient Sanskrit name for the whole of India. This, however, has no historical foundation. Bharatavarsha did not include the whole of India and never did, but only denoted the kingdom of the Aryan invader Bharata, who was a chieftain of one of the Aryan tribes that invaded India. This small region comprised only a small part of the upper Ganges valley. Epigraphic Evidence The epigraphic evidence confirms that Bharata originally did not mean the whole of India. but only a small part of North India. Kharavela who lived c.63 BC - c.23 BC ( C.R.Mishra, p.114 ), was one of the most famous kings of the Kolarian-Dravidian kingdom of Kalinga. His conquests ranged far and wide. They are celebrated in the Hathigumpha inscription. The nineth and tenth lines of this inscription clearly mention that he invaded Bharata from Kalingam thereby implying that Bharata at that time did not include the whole of India -
Line 9-10 : "And, in the nineth year, (His Majesty) [ Kharavela ] caused to be built the great victory place - royal residence at the cost of thirty eight hundred thousand (coins).
" Then, in the 10th year (His Majesty) who embodied the principles of politics, diplomacy and peace, caused (the army) to march towards Bharatavarsha for conquest ." -- ( C.R.Mishra, p.128 )
Prof. C.R.Mishra notes that Bharata did not originally denote India : " Bharatavarsha, here is used in a general sense denoting the regions of northern India " (C.R.Mishra, p.121). Elaborating this, he states that Bharata is mentioned for the first time in the Hatigumpha inscription and that it denoted only a part of North India -
" In the epigraphic records of ancient India, the name `Bharatavarsha' is mentioned for the first time in the Hatigumpha inscription. But the name denoted North India at that time." -- ( C.R.Mishra, p.130, n.79 )
Thus, the first time that we have undisputed usage of the word Bharatavarsha, it denoted only North India. There is no evidence of Bharata's kingdom extending beyond Northern India.
Historical Evidence Historical evidence refutes the Brahmanist claim that Bharata conquered the whole of India. Bharata's ancestors lived in the region of the Caspian sea in Central Asia; they were nomadic tribesmen of Aryan stock. Bharata's legendary capital lay in the Kabul valley, ie. Yusufzai territory of modern Afghanistan:
" According to local tradition, the original seat of the empire of Bharata was much further to the morth-west, namely, at the site now occupied by the ruins of Takh-i-Bahi, in the country of the Yusufzais to the northward of Peshawur." -- ( Wheeler, p.48n.2 )
From this base he descended with his hordes of marauding and massacering Aryan horsemen onto the plains of India. There he defeated Indra ( Wheeler, p.45 ), a descendant of the first Aryan invader Indra, earning himself the title "most renowned of the Lunar race" ( Wheller, p.47 ). He then conquered the Upper Ganges valley, exceeding Indra's dominion.
After the wars of annexation, the Raj of Bharata extended over the enitre doab between the rivers Ganges and the Jumna right up to the junction of these 2 rivers ( Wheeler, p.44 ). It is thus obvious that Bharata's empire, Bharatavarsha, only included a few provinces in the Ganges Valley.
His son Hastin founded Hastinapur further down the Ganges valley, after this second wave of Aryans had pushed on from the neighbourhood of Peshawar up to the banks of the Ganges ( Wheeler, p.48.n2 ). It is thus evident that even the lower Ganges valley was beyond Bharata's control. Hence, the Brahminist concept of `One Ancient Bharata' under perpetual dominion of the Brahmin Aryans is a fallacy. In the words of Winston Churchill, `India is as much a nation as the equator' .
Firstly, there are several things to notice regarding the background of the `scholars' who propound these negationist theories :
Brahmins - Most of the scholars propagating these hypotheses, including Golwalkar and Rajaram, are Brahmins. The rest are either Aryans or a handful of European sympathisers such as Frawley, Gautier and Elst. In all cases, they are all white-skinned Caucasoids who are denying crimes allegedly perpetrated by white-skinned Caucasoids. Taking such attempts seriously is like trying to ask Nazi historians to write an unbiased account of the Holocaust. Whatever unbiased theories shall ultimately prevail, these must be produced by neutral third parties not involved in the incident.
European `Hindus' - Most of the European deniers of Aryan invasions, such as Koenraad Elst, Francois Gautier and David Frawley, are converts to `Hinduism', which in technical terms means one of the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, generally of a Vaishnavite sub-sect. Needless to say, such persons shall not be allowed to enter the Vaishnava Jagannath temple at Puri or many other Vaisnava temples, yet these persons still like to live in a fantasy-world where they imagine themselves to be `Hindu'. Thus, David Frawley is an American convert to Vaishnavism, as is the virulently anti-Islamic Belgian Roman Catholic Koenraad Elst and Francois Gautier is a French devotee of Aurobindo. All these persons have hence adopted the `Indian Home for Aryans' hypothesis as a result of their religious persuasion.
Hindutva - The Denial of Aryan Invasions is central to the Hindutva ideology, a neo-Brahmanist form of Vedic fascism. This movement is famous for being involved in the organisation of pogroms against various races, notably Christians, Dalits, Sikhs and Muslims. The Denial of Aryan Invasions is accompanied by a virulent hatred of Christians and Muslims, who are dubbed as `invaders'. Sudra human-rights activists are, in this framework, dubbed as `traitors' to the `Indian' Brahmanist tradition. Pseudo-Secular Denial
A far more subtle form of denial has, however, been the officially propagated version of history by the `leftist' dominated universities of India for the last 50 years. In this version of teaching, Aryan invasions are accepted; it is also accepted that the Harappan civilization was pre-Aryan. However, the Sudra Holocaust is denied by asserting that the Harappan civilization was not destroyed by the Aryan invaders, but collapsed due to some other means. There was then a `peaceful interaction' between these two cultures, and no Genocide. This version is also referred to as the `soft' AIT (Aryan Invasion Theory), and has caused far more damage to history on account of its `correct' appearance, accepting the most well-established facts. Firstly, most of the Communists and other leftists are Brahmins. Pandit Nehru, his daughter Indira Gandhi (who married the Iranian Brahmin, or `Parsi', Feroze Gandhi) and his grandson (technically still a Brahmin) Rajiv Gandhi were all Brahmins. Namboodirpad, the leader of the first democratically elected Communist government in the world, was a Kerala Brahmin. Virtually the entire hierarchy of Indian Communism, including Marxism and Leninism, consists of Brahmins. More than 60 % of leaders of all Communist organisations in India are Brahmins. Only Maoism, of Chinese origin, is not. The reason for this is that Kautilya, a Brahmin minister during the Mauryan Empire, is the founder of totalitarianism; all forms of communism are based on his teachings as expounded in the Arthasastra. Totalitarian Communism is thus a Brahmin invention. In this Communist framework, the Holocaust is denied by asserting that `natural causes' led to its downfall, or that `internal decay' were the reasons. Again, the motive is the same as in the case of the Brahmin supremacist Hindutva movement, namely to deny the Sudra Genocide. However, since it is not as obviously wrong, this point of view is widely held, even amongst scholars and requires much more effort to disprove. Alternative Theories
The only reason for the fall of the Harappan civilization is due to Aryan invasions. Here all other hypotheses are refuted in a short space. elaborations are to be found in the book; the following is a brief summary :
Comet Impact - Absurd suggestions have been put forth that a cometary impact led to the fall of the Indus Valley. The fact is, no trace of an iridium anomaly that is generally characteristic of all meteorite impacts (eg. the K/T crater in Mexico) has been found. Also absent is any trace of a crater.
Volcanic Eruptions - There are no traces of any volcano vents nearby, nor is there any volcano crater in the vicinity.
Floods & Climate Change - There are signs of flooding in the Indus cities, and climate changes also occurred. The Kautilyanists hence often attribute the demise of the IVC (Indus Valley Civilization) to flooding. Yet the Aryan researchers do not state why these changes occurred. The fact is, as vividly displayed in the book, these changes were brought about by Aryanist environmental destruction. The annihilation of the Indus dam and irrigation system and the fact that Rajastan and the Punjab are now one Great Thar Desert, are all due to the catastrophic environmental degradation caused by the Aryan marauders. Denial of Historical Aryan Invasions
Even historical Aryan Invasions, such as the Ashokan Aryan invasion, or the Maratha Aryan Invasions, are portrayed as `political' wars rather than race wars. Asoka himself, who deported hundreds of thousands of Kalingans, and massacered thousands of Jains after his conversion to Buddhism, are all crimes that have been `white-washed' and erased from the Sudra mind. More significantly, the post-Maratha Marathas are presented as `liberators' from Muslim rule by both `left' and `right', while in actual fact they reinstated Vedic forms of apartheid and suppressed the Dalits in Maharasthra to the the level of sub-humans. The fact that the Marathas massacred half of the `fellow-Hindu' population of Rajastan is also swept under the carpet. The cult of Shivaji in modern times led to the rise of the Maratha fascist Shiv Sena. It is interesting to note that the anti-Islamic rhetoric of the Shiv Sena and its leader Bal Thackeray is of late origin; the movement started and spread solely on the basis of the anti-Dalit platform. Pogroms against the Dalits were organised directly by the Shiv Sena, and statues of Ambedkar continue to be smashed even when the party had officially taken an `anti-Muslim' stand. Secret Motives for the Denial of the Sudra Holocaust
Let it be said straight away - the motive for Indo-Aryan Denial of Aryan Invasions is part of a greater secretive plan to obliterate Sudra civilization from the face of the earth. I now come to explain how this is so. Firstly, there are only two possible motives for such a denial: either out of a sense of guilt, or out of deep-seated, sometimes camouflaged, hatred of the victims. If guilt is the main reason, then the denial of historic crimes is not accompanied by a denigration of the victims' race and culture. It is now imperative to study what are the assertions of the Deniers of the Aryan Invasions : 1) Vedic Indus Valley - The Brahminist theory denying Aryan invasions necessarily implies that the Harappan civilization was `Aryan' and Sanskrit based. Essentially this amounts to a theft of Sudra civilization, implying that the aboriginal was permanently a forest-dweller inherently incapable of creating any civilization. 2) Sub-Human Sudras - Indirectly, this theory implies that the Sudra were not civilized humans, but were sub-humans living in the forest waiting to be civilized by Aryans. 3) Eternal Brahmin Rule - This theory also implies that the Brahmins have been the rulers of all of South Asia from time immemorial. It is another indirect justification for the casteist `Purusha-sukta' hymn of the Vedas which states that the Brahmins were created to rule over humanity on account of their birth from Brahma's head. 6) Sanskrit Origin of Sudric Languages - Again, as per this model, the Sudric (or Dravido-Kolarian) languages are descendants of Sanskrit. Essentially, beneath the veil of pseudo-scholarship, the theory says that Dravidian and Kolarian languages are degraded forms of Sanskrit. 5) Continuation of Apartheid - By its justification of Brahmin rule, and the simultaneous glorification of Shivaji, this theory is basically in justification of apartheid. If follows that the plan of denying the Sudra Holocaust is part of a greater gameplan, ranging from the soft AIT of neo-Kautilyan Communists to the OIT (Out-of-India Theory ) of neo-Manuite Hindutvadins, attempting to obliterate Sudroid (Dravido-Kolaric) civilizations.
The Eighth Aryan Invasion occurred under the Maharashtrian Satavahanas. They invaded Dravidia, sacking several cities and annexing Dravidian lands. This was the first of the Maharasthrian Aryan Invasions. (9) Nineth (Guptan) Aryan Invasion (250 AD) :
Samudra Gupta of the Gupta dynasty in Aryavarta invaded south India and conquered several non-Aryan nations. The famous invasion of Daskhinapatha led to the subjugation of many native Indian races, incl. Tamil Nadu. This led to a hardening of the varna system even in remote areas. Several wars with the Scythians were also waged. (10) Rajput (Scythic) Aryan Invasion (300 AD - 1400 AD) :
The Rajputs are descendants of Scyths, Greeks, Kushans, Romans, etc. who entered India mostly after the fall of Guptan Koshala. Finding Aryavarta (Braj-Koshala) dominated by Aryans, they entered Rajastan and over several centuries, annihilated the Black Abroginal population of Bhils & Minas. (11) Eleventh Aryan Invasion (600 - 1000 AD) :
This occurred under the Maharashtrian Chalukyas, and is also known as the Second Maharasthrian Aryan Invasion. During these wars, Pulkesin II (610 - 642) conquered several Dravidian peoples, and invaded Tamil Nadu. Finally, after severe persecution of Dravidians, a wave of revolt by the Dravidian Shaivite Lingayats destroyed Aryan Chalukya rule. (12) Vijayanagaran Aryan Invasion (1336-1646) :
The semi-Aryanized Andhras embarked on one of the most systematic subjugations of the Dravidian races on record. The entire epoch of the dark Vijayanagar empire was one of conquest, oppression, and mass murder of Dravidians. In the Apartheid Andhrite Vijayanagar varna system, a semi-Aryan Mulatto Nair warrior would shoot a Dravidian Sudra Negro at sight . (13) Oriya Aryan Invasion (1450-60 AD) :
Kapilendradeva of Indo-Aryan Orissa invaded the Dravidian nations in the 1450s-60s, conquering the Reddi kingdom of Vengi and pillaging his way deep into Tamil Nadu. (14) Mughal Caliphate of Islam : The Mughal Caliphate of Delhi in Hindustan (North India) meant the end of the apartheid varna system in the north. Sudra Blacks could re-enter civilization, and contributed much to Mughalstani (Indo-Islamic) civilization as warriors, miners, agricultural labour, police, etc. The varna apartheid system remained in force in Dravida Nadu (South India), however. Here the Aryan Brahmins collaborated with the Aryan Islamic invaders from Central Asia and maintained this inhuman institution.
(15) Marathan (Thirteenth) Aryan Invasion (18th century) :
The barbaric Marathas launched the fourteenth Aryan invasion. All Dravidian nations were subjugated to the Aryan yoke once again. Blacks were subject to severe oppression, eg. the Peshwa rulers forced the Dalits in Maharashtra to carry pots to hold their own spittle and brooms to wipe away their footsteps as they walked. (16) European Aryan Invasions (1500s-1947) :
With the help of the Aryan Brahmans, the Portuguese Aryan invaders managed to conquer Malabar. The Portuguese allowed their white cousins to maintain the apartheid varna system of Manu in most of Malabar, and even adopted some of its features in Goa. The Aryan Anglo-Saxon invaders were also supported by the Indo-Aryans, especially the Brahmans (cf. RSS never opposed the English, Congress supported the English in World War I, etc.). The kindred Aryan civilizations adopted much from each other, eg. the Theosophical Society, etc., but combined in their suppression of Black Sudra civilization. (17) Republic of India (1947 ->) :
The Republic of India officially perpetrated the pro-Aryan government of the English. Thus, Sudra Religion (Saivism) is not recognised as a separate religion, but they are classed, along with all Sudra Blacks, as (Aryan) Hindus. It has been shown that they are not the Hindus. This was mainly due to the racist anti-Sudra M.K.Gandhi, who prevented the British, and later the Indian Government from enacting such legislation. `Khari Boli' Hindi, heavily Sanskritised, is, along with English, the co-official language of India, and is expanding rapidly at the expense of Dravidian tongues.
2. The Vedic & Vaishnava Ideologies of Brahmanism
How did this behaviour pattern persist so consistently over a period of more than 2500 years under very different conditions ? Is there any deeper ideological source ? Was it, as is sometimes claimed, merely due to econonic complustions ? The answer is that these acts are rooted in the Vedic religious teachings and subsequent Vaishnava theology of Brahmanism. It is only for this reason that the Brahmanic world view could persist for such a long period of time. This ideology is derived from the peculiarly Brahmanist Vedic-Vaishnava concepts of Aryan, varna (`skin-color', `caste' or `race'), dasyu (`slavery'), iconoclasm, Manu-Smirti, rakshasa, brahmana, Aryavarta and Brahmavarta. Non-Brahmin India is called upon to make a deeper study of the Vedic and Vaishnava religions than they have hitherto done. It shall neglect this task at its own peril. By means of translations into European languages, these notions entered 19th century Europe and led to the rise of racism and Nazism. Hence, blacks and non-Aryans all over the world are called upon to make a closer scrutiny of the Vedic and Vaishnava religions. Negroes all across the world are called upon to realise that their suffering at the hands of Caucasoids did not start in the 18th century with the rise of plantation slavery in the US South, but date back to several centuries, and started with the Aryan invasion of India.
3. Negationism & Denial of Aryan Invasions
Negationism in General
Genocide has been a recurring event in human history. Thus, the genocide of the Native Americans by invading Latin Europeans, the mass murders of Communism, and the massacres of ethnic Palestinians by Isreali Jews are all historically documented events. Yet, each episode has its own brand of deniers and negationists. At the same time it must be admitted that sometimes the claim of genocide is now all too commonly used, being applied for even small-scale massacres which technically speaking do not come under that category. I shall show that the Aryan Invasions led to several Holocausts of staggering magnitude, including the Sudra Holocaust, which was the largest of these. Denial of the Aryan Invasions
In recent years a considerable vociferous movement has arisen completely denying the Aryan invasions. This brand of `scholars' goes to any length to deny the notion of any Aryan invasion. Even physical facts are distorted merely to fit in with their fanciful concepts. Another fraud perpetrated by these scholars is to perpetually claim that their theory denying an Aryan invasion is `new'. This is definitely not true; indeed, the traditional Vaishnava Puranic view, which is supported by all the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, is that the Aryas migrated from Aryavarta in Bharat and then spread all across the world. Moreover, ever since the discovery of the non-Aryan Harappan civilization the Aryans have been inventing wild and fantastic theories denying the invasion. Patterns in the Deniers of Holocaust
What could be the reasons for such a vociferous denial of established facts ? Is it just plain guilt ? Or is there some hidden agenda ?
The discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization in the 1920s brought to light a suppressed chapter of Indian history, namely the large-scale destruction and genocide perpetrated over 1000 years by the Aryan invaders on indigenous Negroid Sudras, Mongoloids and Semites. However, this episode is blatantly denied by the Brahmin-controlled press of India, which propagates highly distorted versions of history, and even goes to the extent of denying that any genocide took place. Such distortion of history leads to the continuation of crimes against humanity; the massacre of Sudroid Tamils in Sri Lanka by Aryan Buddhists and the genocide of Dalits by the Brahmanist Republic of India after 1947 are merely consequences of the negationist mindset. In order to comprehend current Caucasoid-Negroid conflicts in South Asia, it is necessary to comprehend the full history of the engagement. In order to solve the current Arya-Sudra problem in India a clear unbiased understanding of history is required. This book seeks to address some of these concerns, and hopes to provide a factual account of atrocities perpetrated by the Aryan invaders. This book demonstrates that the Aryan invasions were the most severe catastrophe to afflict the Indian subcontinent. In fact, several Holocausts occurred during this period :
The Semitic Holocaust - This refers to the annihilation of the Indic Semitic peoples comprising the Indo-Assyrians (`Asuras') and the Indo-Pheonicians (`Pnais').
The Sudra Holocaust - By far the most severe Holocaust was that inflicted upon the Sudra Negroids, who were exterminated from all of North India. Under the impact of the Aryan invasions, the Sudroid race broke up into the disparate units of Dravidians, Kolarians, Dalits and Adivasis. The Dravidian Brahui isolate surviving in Baluchistan is an extremely northern isolate of the ancient Sudric stock.
The Naga Holocaust - The Indo-Mongoloid populations of Eastern India were also massacered during the Later Aryan invasions in what is referred to as the Naga or Kirata holocaust. The behaviour pattern of the invaders was not limited to slaughter during war-times, but embraced the large-scale persecution of indigenous populations. There were several aspects to the invasions, which were as follows :
Mass slaughter of non-Aryans not only during war but also during peacetime.
Establishment of the Vedic Apartheid (`caturvarna') System based on varna (race, or skin colour).
Vedic human sacrifice (`purushamedha') of large numbers of non-Aryans by Vedic Brahmins.
Forced Labour extracted from non-Brahmins.
Capture of large numbers of non-combatant men, women and children as booty and their sale into slavery in Aryan households.
Forcible conversion of people, initially to the Vedic religion, and later to the 6 orthodox schools of Brahmanism, mainly to Vaishnavism.
Reduction of the Status of first non-Aryans and later non-brahmins to that of sub-humans through prevention of learning and destruction of non-Brahmin literature and culture.
Destruction of temples belonging to pre-Brahmanic religions like Shaivism, Shaktism and Tantrism and their replacement with Vedist and Vaishnava mandirs.
Impoverishment of the non-Aryans, and later of non-Brahmins, through religious fraud, appropriation of land, discriminatory taxes, and confiscation of womens' properties after the Sati ritual. Nor was this conflict over with the end of the Brahmanic Dark Ages in 1000 AD. The Vijayanagar Kingdom of South India re-imposed the harsh Vedic apartheid caste system, whoch was again adopted by the Maratha kingdom. During the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era, this Aryan revival spread from the South and infected the more liberal Islamicised North. The Government of India also permits the continuation of the Vedic caste system in many parts of its territory. Tnis book does not attempt to study all aspects of the age under question, but shall present a brief account of the events. By necessity, the ghastly nature of the Aryan invasion makes any such task extremely unpleasant. More so, when one comes to Brahminist politics, with its ruthless Kautilyan creation and destrucion of entire states and peoples. Yet all throughout, I have kept a basically objective view of events.
1. The Aryan Invasions
The following are the invasions elaborated in the later parts of the book. The all-pervading spirit of negationism falsely portrays ancient racial conflicts as purely political struggles. The following pages shall rectify that. To summarise, there was not one, but several Aryan invasions during the history of India. (1) Rigvedic Aryan Invasion (1500 BC) :
The First Aryan Invasion involved the annihilation of the Semito-Negroid (Sudra-Panian) Indus Valley civilization by the hordes of Indra , and the slaughter of 5 million of its inhabitants. The Indus irrigation system was shattered to permanently destroy agriculture in the region. Sudroid blacks were displaced from all of North India, the survivors retreating to the hill tracts of Bundelkhand-Gondwana. (2) Second Aryan Invasion (1400 BC) :
Bharata launched the second Aryan invasion from Afghanistan, and conquered much of the upper Ganges valley, defeating the descendants of the first wave of invasions under Indra. (3) The Krishnaite (Third) Aryan Invasion (1200 BC) :
Krishna launched the third Aryan invasion, invading Western India (Gujarat, Rajastan etc.) from Mathura in Aryavarta. He finally established his capital there, naming it Dwarka. He destroyed the surviving traces of the Indus Valley civilization, abducting and raping 16000 women (low-caste `gopis') of the races he exterminated. Survivals of these acts are found in the much toned-down Krishna-gopi songs. (4) Mahabharatan Aryan Invasion (900-800 BC) :
The Fourth Aryan Invasion occurred in 2 parts: First, the Digvijay Aryan invasions that led to the subjugation of all of India to the Aryan yoke. The revolt by the non-Aryans and mixed races led to the terrible Mahabharatan War between the Aryan Pandavas on one side and the mixed race Kauravas and black aboriginals on the other. The Aryan victory enabled them to invade & settle in the Ganges valley and confirmed Aryan dominance. The genocides of this war permanently changed the racial composition of India. These conflicts were some of the most terrible recorded. (5) Fifth (Solar) Aryan Invasion (800 BC) :
The Fifth Aryan invasion is named Solar, since the Aryans who invaded India during this epoch were of the Solar race (Suryavamsi), while the earlier Aryans were of Lunar race (Chandravamsi). Kashyap (ie. from the Caspian) is the progenitor of the Solar race of kings. From the Caspian they swept down into India, driving the preceding peoples before them. Ikshvaku established his chiefdom at Ayodhya, while his grandson Mithi conquered Mithila (named after him). Parasurama continued the 5th Aryan invasion, exterminating various aboriginal races. (6) Ramaite Aryan Invasion & Dravidian Holocaust (600 BC) :
The 6th Aryan invasion of the deep South (Dravidia) by the armies of `Lord' Ram led to the fall of the Rakshasa (Dravidian) empire & the destruction of the splendid city of Ravana. The apartheid varna system was imposed, with those black Dravidian Sudras who accepted Aryan enslavement being relegated to the `Clean Sudra' caste , while those who fought the Aryans were relegated to the `Untouchable Sudra' castes (`panchama') of Dalits and Adivasis. The worship of the Aryan religion of Vaishnavism was introduced, and most Dravidians in Lanka exterminated. (7) Buddhist Aryan Invasion (260 BC) :
This Seventh Aryan invasion was launched by Askoka, King of Aryan Magadha. His attack on Kolarian Kalinga led to the horrible Kalinga War, in which 200,000 black aboriginals were killed & countless more enslaved. Several wars with the aboriginal races were waged. The Aryanised religions of Jainism and Buddhism entered South India. Although these religions were liberal with Aryan castes, and Buddha was in fact a Mongoloid, these faiths kept the fundamental Aryan-Sudroid apartheid varna system. The Aryan Sinhalese Buddhists, invading from East India, meanwhile, exterminated the entire population of native black Dravidoids . Staunch Buddhist fanatics, they destroyed scores of Shaiva shrines, erecting Buddhist temples on the ruins and eventually eradicating Shaivism from Lanka. (8) Eighth Aryan Invasion (100 BC) :
I guess you are mentally retarded. First, just answer the question. And for God sakes use your own brain this time. Do the Vedas,Puranas,Ramayan or the Gita mention any place outside of India? Its a simple question.
It is quite incredible that the so called Aryans could have made a transition from the arid deserts of Central Asia to the monsoonal lands of Northern India and yet failed to record it.
And now to the issue of Lord Rama. He can be born in Afghanistan or anywhere else. Two things are synomous with his name. The city of Ayodhya and the river Saraswati which has dried up. He was have supposed to have ruled Ayodhya and thats all that matters. The city is still there.
The Vedic culture was thus said to be that of primitive nomads who came out of Central Asia with their horse-drawn chariots and iron weapons and overthrew the cities of the more advanced Indus valley culture, with their superior battle tactics. It was pointed out that no horses, chariots or iron was discovered in Indus valley sites.
Further excavations discovered horses not only in Indus Valley sites but also in pre-Indus sites. The use of the horse has thus been proven for the whole range of ancient Indian history. Evidence of the wheel, and an Indus seal showing a spoked wheel as used in chariots, has also been found, suggesting the usage of chariots.
Moreover, the whole idea of nomads with chariots has been challenged. Chariots are not the vehicles of nomads. Their usage occured only in ancient urban cultures with much flat land, of which the river plain of north India was the most suitable. Chariots are totally unsuitable for crossing mountains and deserts, as the so-called Aryan invasion required.
Further excavation revealed that the Indus Valley culture was not destroyed by outside invasion, but according to internal causes and, most likely, floods. Most recently a new set of cities has been found in India (like the Dwaraka and Bet Dwaraka sites by S.R. Rao and the National Institute of Oceanography in India) which are intermidiate between those of the Indus culture and later ancient India as visited by the Greeks. This may eliminate the so-called dark age following the presumed Aryan invasion and shows a continuous urban occupation in India back to the beginning of the Indus culture.
Lost city found off Indian coast
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lost city found off Indian coast
Divers could only explore part of the site
An ancient underwater city has been discovered off the coast of south-eastern India.
Divers from India and England made the discovery based on the statements of local fishermen and the old Indian legend of the Seven Pagodas.
The ruins, which are off the coast of Mahabalipuram, cover many square miles and seem to prove that a major city once stood there.
A further expedition to the region is now being arranged which will take place at the beginning of 2003.
'International significance'
The discovery was made on 1 April by a joint team of divers from the Indian National Institute of Oceanography and the Scientific Exploration Society based in Dorset.
Expedition leader Monty Halls said: "Our divers were presented with a series of structures that clearly showed man-made attributes.
The expedition team want to return next year
"The scale of the site appears to be extremely extensive, with 50 dives conducted over a three-day period covering only a small area of the overall ruin field.
"This is plainly a discovery of international significance that demands further exploration and detailed investigation."
During the expedition to the site, divers came across structures believed to be man-made.
One of the buildings appears to be a place of worship, although they could only view part of what is a huge area suggesting a major city.
Jealous Gods
The myths of Mahabalipuram were first set down in writing by British traveller J. Goldingham who visited the South Indian coastal town in 1798, at which time it was known to sailors as the Seven Pagodas.
The myths speak of six temples submerged beneath the waves with the seventh temple still standing on the seashore.
Structures are clearly visible in the murky waters
The myths also state that a large city once stood here which was so beautiful the gods became jealous and sent a flood that swallowed it up entirely in a single day.
One of the expedition team, Graham Hancock, said: "I have argued for many years that the world's flood myths deserve to be taken seriously, a view that most Western academics reject.
"But here in Mahabalipuram we have proved the myths right and the academics wrong."
Scientists now want to explore the possibility that the city was submerged following the last Ice Age.
If this proves correct, it would date the discovery at more than 5,000 years old.
news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english...923794.stm
Hindus fourth on list of SAT toppers
Hindus fourth on list of SAT toppers
Ganesh S. Lakshman (IANS)
New York, May 1
Hindus fare the fourth-best in scholastic aptitude tests (SAT), says a US College Board statistical finding that has ranked 10 religious affiliations on the basis of their test scores.
A Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report says Hindus are fourth in a list of 10 religious affiliations that fare the best in college-entry level examinations. While the national average SAT score of college-bound seniors was 1,020, those belonging to the Unitarian Universalist Association figured the best with a score of 1,209.
Jews follow them with a score of 1,161, while those affiliated with the Quakers scored 1,153. Hindus figured fourth with a figure of 1,110. The board administers the SAT exam, a major component of most college rankings and admission decisions.
The WSJ report says Vanderbilt University, based in Nashville, Tennessee, is pursuing this "elite strategy" of wooing students of a particular ethnic background to boost academic standing. It circulated brochures at the Union of American Hebrew Congregations in Boston last December with a view to enrolling Jewish students.
Vanderbilt University Chancellor Gordon Gee was quoted as saying: "Yes, we are targeting Jewish students... There's nothing wrong with that. That's not affirmative action. That's smart thinking."
Apart from Vanderbilt University, some official Christian campuses like the Southern Methodist University and the Texas Christian University (TCU) are also ardently pursuing Jews. TCU, affiliated with the Protestant denomination Disciples of Christ, hired its first Jewish studies professor last year and has also reportedly initiated merit scholarships specifically for Jewish students.
Out of the Ivy League schools, about 23 per cent of students are Jewish, though Jews comprise two per cent of the US population.
Torchbearers of hate
By Patwant Singh
http://www.asianageonline.com
Normally, folly in everyday use, means a foolish act. Or being foolish. When used in relation to acts of governments, folly takes on a different dimension; it often translates into a dangerous odyssey on which states are launched by recalcitrant leaders whose reckless acts kill countless people. As the depraved killings across Gujarat showed, governmental follies can take a deadly toll.
If the Central government’s perverse persistence in the politics of religion precipitated the Gujarat massacres, and its refusal to intervene swiftly and decisively imparted an even more sinister edge to the tragedy, the state government’s deliberate inaction under its fundamentalist chief minister allowed the murders to continue unchecked for over four days and nights.
Between them these two put the official seal of approval on Gujarat’s ethnic cleansing. In no civilised country do those elected to govern, so abuse the trust placed in them, with the exception of Slobodan Milosevic or some other Serb or Bosnian despot. India has proved it is no better than them.
What made the Gujarat nightmare worse was the sense of déjà vu, a re-enactment of the macabre dance of death orchestrated against the Sikhs in 1984. Then, as now, the Central government, its ministers, members of Parliament, and the police and administration colluded in the killing of innocent Indian citizens.
But Indian Muslims have borne the main brunt of such murderous attacks over the years, instigated and encouraged by the political and civil establishments, with the active assistance of parties whose sole justification for existence is to communalise the Indian polity.
The anti-Muslim riots which stand out for their methodology and viciousness took place at Ranchi and Hatiya (1967), Ahmedabad (1969), Bhiwandi (1970), Jalgaon (1970), and Bombay (1992-93), in addition to the Muslim killings which came in the wake of Mr L.K. Advani’s 1990 journey across India in a Toyota dressed up as a mythical chariot. The chronology of such crimes does not end there.
Attacks on Christians and their places of worship — hitherto unaffected by the blood-letting of other minorities — also began in the 1990s. And despite the RSS chief Rajendra Singh’s condemnation of them (on January 2, 1999) as being against “the very grain of the Hindu ethos where all ways of worship are treated with respect” the intensity and frequency of the targeting of Christians has increased year after year.
In the context of Hindu-Muslim riots, a short but significant Hindi novel, Curfew in the City, by Vibhuti Narain Rai, published in 1988, provides valuable insights. In normal circumstances it might have gone unnoticed, but for the fact that Vibhuti Rai was — and still is — a serving police officer of integrity and strong convictions who as senior superintendent of police in Allahabad in 1980, had handled communal rioting there.
The experience made him embark on his novel whose story — covering just three days — is centered on a Muslim family in an Allahabad caught up in the frenzy of a Hindu-Muslim riot.
Another reason why Curfew attracted attention was that since its theme covers more than those three days, the book — as C.M. Naim explains in his “Foreword” — earned, “a ‘fatwa’ from Shri Ashok Singhal, the secretary general of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. Not surprisingly, he had not even bothered to read the book, for he advised Mr Rai to resign from the government service before publishing his book.”
What is more, because an Allahabad journalist wanted to make a feature film based on Curfew, Singhal “threatened to burn down any cinema house that would dare to show the proposed film.”
Considering the large-scale arson in Gujarat over the last several days, not just of properties but of men, women and children as well, Mr Singhal and his followers are no pushovers when it comes to torching properties and people. So the producer with remarkable prescience dropped the film project.
The English translation of the book was published in 1998 which I read, before meeting Rai. By that time he had spent a year studying the role of the police during communal riots, with special emphasis on the rampant communalism in the subcontinent, and “its ugliest manifestation, the communal riot.” I found his analysis and assessments informed and incisive, and was impressed by the fact that the National Police Academy had given him a fellowship and funded his research.
This goes to prove that the communal virus has neither affected all Indians, nor everyone of a particular community. Have the remarkable findings of his study been used in a handbook for the police to prevent tragedies such as Gujarat’s from occurring? Given the degree to which the authorities suborned arson and mass murder there, it could also be one way of making it more
difficult for politicians to prevent the police from carrying out its responsibilities.
Of particular interest are Rai’s clarifications on who suffers most in Hindu-Muslim riots. In his “Afterword” on the anatomy of the “most terrible riot” in Ahmedabad in 1969, he points out that: “According to the figures presented by the state government to the Inquiry Commission headed by Justice Jagmohan Reddy, 6742 houses or shops were burned down in that riot; out of them, only 671 belonged to the Hindus, the rest 6,071 belonged to the Muslims.
The total value of the property destroyed in the riot came to Rs 42,324,068: out of it the value of the property that belonged to the Hindus was Rs 7,585,845 while the value of the property that belonged to the Muslims was Rs 34,738,224. Of the 512 fatalities, 24 were Hindus, 413 were Muslims, while the remaining 75 could not be identified.”
He also says, “there was probably not a single riot where the percentage of the Muslim casualties to the total were less than seventy,” and adds that “in the many riots all over the country subsequent to the destruction of the mosque that percentage has in fact been above ninety.”
The question worth asking here is: if the terrible riot of 1969 took such a deadly toll, how is that an even worse riot was allowed to take place in the same city 33 years later?
On the psychology of the majority community Rai feels that “without fully changing it, it wouldn’t be possible to stop communal riots.
Right-thinking members of the majority community will have to acknowledge that repeatedly the victims of their aggression are the members of the minority community; that the minorities have as much right to this land as they have and that during periods of communal tension, the job of the police and the Army is not to take the side of the majority community but to provide protection to the minorities.” He is equally straightforward and even-handed in analysing the shortfalls of the Muslim community.
Now for the experience of the Sikhs after Mrs Gandhi’s death on October 31, 1984. The Nanavati Commission which is presently conducting hearings into the systematic killings then, will hopefully, provide valuable insights into the anatomy of that tragedy. So that when — and if — an enquiry into the Gujarat events does take place, it could benefit from it. Justice Nanavati is an upright and honest man and his findings should come as a reminder to the smug Indian state of the sleazy methods its functionaries resort to, to achieve their sordid political ends.
I was the first witness to depose before the Nanavati Commission on April 17, 2001. It has since examined 170 witnesses including former Prime Ministers, politicians, police and administrative officials.
In my affidavit to Justice Nanavati, and during my personal deposition as well, I pointed out that on the afternoon of November 1, 1984, I.K. Gujral, Lieutenant General Jagjit Singh Aurora and I had gone to see the home minister, P.V. Narasimha Rao, to urge him to take immediate steps to stop the killing of Sikhs — which had started already — all over Delhi.
We found Rao at home “looking impassive and seemingly without a care. The atmosphere at the home minister’s house did not show at all that there was any crisis in the country, and in the very capital around the home minister’s own house.” We told him that the least he could do was to call in the Army. He said it would take up positions in Delhi that very evening.
The home minister lied to us because the Army was not called till the night of November 3. What is not so well known is that a unit of the 15th Sikh LI had already taken up duties on the morning of November 1, and had saved several lives in the Safdarjung Development Area, when it was abruptly ordered back to barracks that same afternoon.
I have recounted this in detail in my book The Sikhs. Had it not been withdrawn, 3000 Sikhs would not have died, nor would their homes, shops, factories, taxis, trucks, and places of worship been torched under the indulgent eyes of the administration and a partisan police force.
Does this ring a bell? Does the administration’s deliberate inaction, secret collusion and dereliction of duty in Delhi in 1984 help us better understand the callousness of Gujarat’s chief minister, his misleading propaganda, his deliberate stalling of the Army’s deployment, the blackout of TV coverage, his attempts to stop members of Parliament from visiting the state, his uncouth description of the killings and torching of properties as the “natural outpouring of people’s anger?” His list of misdeeds warrants his government’s dismissal, and the imposition of President’s Rule in Gujarat.
Is the Central government willing to prove to a watching world that India is as prepared to end state terrorism, as terrorism of other kinds? There can be no divergence of views on what needs to be done about the depraved murder of 58 men, women and children when the train they were travelling in was set on fire at Godhra on February 27. This appalling crime must be thoroughly investigated and the guilty severely punished.
By the same token the sadistic killers who were allowed to run riot all over Gujarat must also be awarded exemplary punishment. But will they? The levels of our degradation can be judged from the fact that when Raashid Alvi, MP, stood up in the Lok Sabha on March 1 to bring to the speaker’s notice the killing of Eshan Jaffrey by a mob in Ahmedabad on February 28, no one supported his motion to pay homage to this former member of Parliament.
Not even Jaffrey’s own party members, the Congress MPs! Now consider this disgraceful move by the Gujarat chief minister: he has awarded Rs 200,000 compensation to the heirs of Godhra victims, and Rs 100,000 to others done to death all over the state! Is this how secular India evaluates the worth of its citizens? Incidentally, Parliament is yet to condole the deaths of 3000 Sikhs killed in the capital in November 1984.
These aberrations do not reflect the health of India’s democracy. They mirror the malfunctioning of a lawless state. As a sequel to my article on the survival of democracies published in this paper on February 10, a communication from Siddhartha Banerjee, a friend who lives in Wilmington, Delaware, had this to say: “On September 11 last year, some twenty Muslims from abroad kill some 3,500 Americans.
There are fears of a backlash against Muslims, or people who ‘look’ like them in the US. Two people are killed in the backlash... People all over America, politicians included, speak out against murder or discrimination premised on ‘guilt by association’. Considering the enormity of America’s shock and suffering that awful day, the system worked.
“And in India? Last week Muslims kill some 50 compatriots, Hindus, on a train. The result, some 500 Muslim dead so far... victims of ‘avenging’ Hindu killers. The police watch. The system fails to intervene to protect its minorities. The sin of the Muslim dead? They shared the faith of the killers of the 50 Hindus on the train. ‘Guilt by association’ is clearly alive and well in India.
“Perhaps, it is time to send Prime Minister Vajpayee a parcel containing a few hundred of our Indian passports with a small note saying, ‘Mr Prime Minister, thanks, but we renounce our citizenship. A state that will not protect its minorities is no democracy.’ And then, let’s pour our passion for the country, and our time and money, into groups who are working to ensure that India does not become a murderous theocracy.” That about sums it up.